Tag: Paul McCartney

  • When will the Beatles bandwagon end?

    When will the Beatles bandwagon end?

    The Beatles broke up in 1970, but you wouldn’t know it from the activity of the last few years. In no particular order, we have had an underwhelming valedictory single, “Now and Then,” raised from the dead thanks to the wonders of artificial intelligence and Peter Jackson alike; an eight-hour – eight!– documentary, Get Back, resurrected from the footage of the Let It Be sessions; and now, an all-singing, all-dancing reissue on Disney+ of the Nineties Anthology documentary series, which has been promoted with the fourth volume of offcuts and rare tracks from the band’s career, appropriately titled Anthology 4.

    Even the biggest fan of the Beatles in the world – and I believe them to be the greatest band there has ever been – might be forgiven for feeling somewhat overwhelmed at this artistic necrophilia. Forty-five years after John Lennon was assassinated, the Beatles are now purely the preserve and creation of Paul McCartney, and the amiable but ruthless Liverpudlian has ensured that “his” band continues to be seen as a trendsetting, risk-taking enterprise. Hence this rag-tag assortment of 36 tracks, running a shade under two hours.

    In truth, anyone who has already purchased many of the reissued Beatles albums over the years, including Let It Be… Naked – McCartney stripping the band’s underwhelming final release of the Phil Spector overdubs – will have heard many of the tracks, meaning that only casual fans will find this wholly original. And I doubt that most casual fans will be especially bothered by the opportunity to hear, say, the orchestral arrangements for “I Am The Walrus” and “Something” – the latter of which sounds like really good film music and makes one salute George Martin’s skills as an arranger – or a third take version of “While My Guitar Gently Weeps.”

    The earlier material, meanwhile, is charming – such as the first take of “In My Life,” a song that only grows in poignancy and pathos as the years go by – but it also reminds the listener that over the decade or so that the Beatles were in operation, they had a remarkably swift trajectory from highly successful, polished pop music to daring, boundary-pushing experimentation that was nevertheless always rooted in the Tin Pan Alley-esque basics of great, classical songwriting savvy. It is nigh-on impossible to listen to the final three songs on Abbey Road and not be deeply affected by McCartney attempting to make his peace with a legacy that has, of course, defined his life and work ever since. No wonder he sang “Boy, you’re going to carry that weight a long time”; for the last 55 years, that weight has indeed been carried, through thick and thin alike.

    Anthology 4 will not be the last release of the Beatles. The nearly unlistenable experimental jam Carnival of Light has never been officially (or unofficially) released, and it seems likely that one day McCartney will set it free from its cage, and there are many hundreds of other versions of songs, takes, instrumentals and the like waiting to appear on Anthology 13 and the like. For the committed aficionado, who can have an hour-long argument about whether the sixth or eighth take of the studio version of “Hello Goodbye” is superior, this will be nothing less than nirvana.

    Yet I can’t help thinking – allied to the underwhelm of “Now and Then” – that, for the first time, the sheer accumulation of detail and trivia runs the risk of letting daylight in upon magic, and making the Beatles seem, well, ordinary – which is something that they never were, or never could be. Perhaps McCartney and Ringo, who are both awaiting the Sam Mendes-directed films about each member of the band – expected in 2028 – might be advised to step in and say, “Right lads, enough is enough”, and to let the whole, magnificent enterprise rest in dignity. You might even say that it was time to let it be.

  • Uncovering Brian Wilson’s real genius

    Uncovering Brian Wilson’s real genius

    The death earlier this year of Brian Wilson, aged 82, was marked by the usual tributes to a man who was not only a pioneer of popular music, but also a sadly troubled genius whose early years of wild success were quickly overtaken by decades of drug addiction and mental health problems. A recurring theme in the obituaries was what might have happened in the aftermath of the Beach Boys’ masterpiece, 1966’s Pet Sounds, if Wilson, by then the band’s producer and lead songwriter, had not descended almost immediately into narcotic-induced torpor. It has commonly been suggested that Paul McCartney – who revered Wilson – was also jealous of the achievement of Pet Sounds, which arguably overshadowed the Beatles’ Revolver, and that Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band was an attempt to reassert the Liverpudlian quartet’s primacy.

    It certainly did so. However, what McCartney may or may not have known was that Wilson had planned a magnum opus that would have made both Sgt. Pepper and Pet Sounds look like amateur dabbling. Entitled Smile and composed and arranged by Wilson with the orchestrator and lyricist Van Dyke Parks, it would have been something unique in the annals of American music. Yet over the abortive 15-month recording process (Sgt. Pepper took more than four), Wilson’s grandiose, envelope-pushing vision came up against his already-fraying psyche, and the result was the most famous unfinished and (initially) unreleased album ever made.

    Smile has been a byword for many things in the often-cautious music industry. The first fruits of the recording sessions in 1966, which saw de facto leader of the Beach Boys Mike Love writing lyrics after being sidelined during Pet Sounds, produced nothing less than the single “Good Vibrations,” which was considered too esoteric and avant-garde to be included on the earlier album. It is not hard to see why. Wilson had unwisely begun to dose himself up with LSD, and listened to the similarly expansive and orchestrated work of Phil Spector under the influence of these mind-bending drugs. He started to believe that his role was not simply to be a singer and composer, but to communicate some hitherto-obscure but deeply wonderful cosmic truth to his millions of admirers.

    “Good Vibrations” – which itself took seven months to record to Wilson’s satisfaction – was a colossal hit, topping the Billboard charts and the UK singles chart alike, and selling more than two million copies in the first few months of its release. It was a strange but successful mixture of Love’s relatively straightforward and even cheeky lyrics – “excitations” was not commonly believed to be a word beforehand – with Wilson’s extraordinary, baroque improvisations and flourishes. It should have been incoherent and all but unlistenable, but instead it transcended what popular music had previously been capable of. Not everyone was convinced, however. McCartney called it “a great record,” but said it lacked the emotional punch of Pet Sounds, and the Who’s guitarist and songwriter Pete Townshend complained that “‘Good Vibrations’ was probably a good record but who’s to know? You had to play it about 90 bloody times to even hear what they were singing about.”

    Nonetheless, emboldened by the conspicuous success of what was intended to be Smile’s first single, Wilson began to come out with increasingly bizarre ideas as to what the album should be like. Announcing, under the heavy influence of drugs, that it would be “a teenage symphony to God,” he also suggested that it would be influenced by American popular music, history, the occult and Manifest Destiny. Sonically, he wished to move beyond the traditional harmonies and surf music that the Beach Boys were synonymous with in favor of a shifting, innovative sound that would owe debts to everyone from George Gershwin and Charles Ives to Disney cartoons and avant-garde jazz. It was a mark both of Wilson’s ambition and his declining mental state that he imported huge quantities of sand into his dining room, so that he could sit at the piano and feel the grains shifting between his toes. He claimed it brought him closer to nature.

    Capitol Records, which intended to release the album, knew little of this. It assumed that Smile would be released in early 1967, designed a logo and assigned it a catalog number. Unfortunately, amid significant in-fighting with the band (not least Love, who, wearying of his reduced status, kept pressuring Wilson to release a proper album and to leave aside “the experimental shit”), it swiftly became clear that the Beach Boys were unable to come together to finish the record.

    When the Beatles released “Strawberry Fields Forever” and its superior, underrated A-side “Penny Lane” in February 1967, it seemed as if they had usurped much of Wilson’s creative spirit, and the advent of Sgt. Pepper on June 2 in the United States ended Capitol’s interest in indulging the project any longer. The Beach Boys were curtly informed to put out another single – which duly followed, in the form of “Heroes and Villains” – and then to release whatever they could scrape together, so that the huge amount of money and time spent on the recording process was not entirely wasted.

    Smiley Smile from 1967 was not regarded with the same enthusiasm that Pet Sounds was. Wilson all but abandoned it to his bandmates (tellingly, the production credits read “The Beach Boys”) and although it has enjoyed a latter-day reappraisal as a chill-out comedown album, it was a strangely unfocused and soporific record. Listening to “Heroes and Villains” in this bowdlerized, unsatisfying form, when compared to the Spector-esque production that Wilson had originally intended for Smile, is all that the average listener needs to do in order to dismiss the album.

    Its architect, despairing of the music industry and its machinations, became a suicidal recluse, bingeing on drugs, alcohol and food. He was occasionally seen “in the back of some limousine, cruising around Hollywood, bleary and unshaven, huddled way tight into himself,” according to the journalist Nik Cohn. He underwent breakdown after breakdown and spent most of the next few decades unable to produce any significant music, despite the entreaties of his bandmates and record companies. The albums he did record were scrappy, forgettable affairs that relied heavily on cowriters.

    There was litigation with the Beach Boys (especially Love) over who owned the rights to what, but Wilson was regarded as a spent creative force who had never really come out of his sandbox. He showed no signs of ever recapturing the Pet Sounds and Smile genius.

    Something shifted at the beginning of the millennium, not wholly to Wilson’s advantage. He was prevailed upon in the early 2000s to perform Pet Sounds, backed by an orchestra, and although the tour was critically acclaimed – albeit with surprise that Wilson was still capable of making music – it lost money because of the expensive musicians. However, in 2004 Wilson returned to the Royal Festival Hall in London to perform Smile for the first time with a stripped-down (but still sizable) band, which did a magnificent job of returning the album to its origins, taking the lackluster production of Smiley Smile away and bringing in an appropriate Wall-of-Sound level of grandeur to it. Unfortunately, Wilson was clearly incapable of appreciating it. A gargantuan, obviously uneasy figure whose painfully scripted banter had to be read from a teleprompter, he was moved into position by his bandmates and sang in a staccato bark that bore little resemblance to the more tuneful vocals of his heyday.

    The result was a final, belated release of the album, now entitled Brian Wilson Presents Smile. It was a finely tuned, carefully put together release that gave an infinitely better idea of what Smile would have sounded like if it had come out in 1967 rather than the compromised version. Critics greeted it with a mixture of amazement and relief, hailing it as the finest version of a once-lost album that we were now ever likely to get. Only Wilson’s singing was a reminder that the once all-conquering musician was now a diminished figure. When a 2011 compilation, The Smile Sessions, was released, complete with his more tuneful youthful vocals, it managed to give a moving and even uplifting insight into the sheer level of genius that Wilson was capable of in his heyday.

    The tributes after Wilson’s death all mentioned Pet Sounds, “Good Vibrations” and the years of mental illness and personal havoc. Some were kinder than others, but all agreed that Brian Wilson was a musical genius who was ultimately crushed by the sheer weight of his imaginative talent. In the various forms of Smile, incomplete and compromised though most of them necessarily are, we can see the purest form of Wilson’s songwriting ability and we should marvel that any man, let alone a troubled 24-year-old, was capable of such work.

    McCartney, for one, might be very grateful that the album never came to fruition at the time, as otherwise he would have had a serious rival on his hands for the title of “greatest pop writer of the century.” Smile shows us exactly what genius, in its untidy, unfinished glory, can be capable of.

    This article was originally published in The Spectator’s November 10, 2025 World edition.

  • Eyes of the Storm revisits an era

    Eyes of the Storm revisits an era

    At Eyes of the Storm, the de Young Museum’s exhibition of photographs taken by Paul McCartney, mainly on the Beatles’ first American visit, the typical viewer will be surprised to find herself empathizing more with the rock stars than the audience. In early photos, the crowds – and the band members – are eager, curious and frank. But through the months and the cities and photoshoots, the Beatles learn to pose. They soon find themselves flattened by a camera’s gaze in a way all too familiar to just about everyone today.

    The collection opens with the Beatles’ British tour in 1963 and residency in Paris in early 1964. “We were just wondering at the world,” McCartney writes, “just excited about all these little things that were making up our lives. We were fascinated with what we were doing and what was happening to us.” These early photographs catch the casual watchfulness, the carefree listening and the quiet affection of the band backstage. In “Ringo Starr, 1964,” for instance, a fit of laughter catches the drummer. An attentive photographer – one who delighted in and perhaps himself was also caught in Ringo’s laughter – captured the moment in a way that seems unthinking. Such images are undeniably tender.

    ‘We were fascinated with what we were doing and what was happening to us’

    Then comes the novelty of the Beatles’ first transatlantic flight and their reception in New York, where McCartney’s camera turns from his bandmates to the crowds. The Beatles arrived in America just after the JFK assassination, but instead of finding a nation numb with grief, they met exuberant friendliness. Photography is, of course, a silent medium. McCartney’s pictures mute the screaming and suspend the roiling of the crowd, bringing individuals’ expressions into focus. The simplicity of his black-and-white film, and the gentle gradation of its range, bring a quiet coherence to congested scenes. In “Press Call in Central Park, 1964,” the press photographers laugh at finding McCartney’s light 35mm Pentax turned on them. Women giggle as they wave. Even some policemen laugh as they catch girls breaking past them into the street. McCartney and the crowds share a mutual delight in the novelty of seeing one another and in the exuberance of being seen.

    One image, “Unknown Girl, Washington, 1964,” catches a child in a headscarf gazing at McCartney with remarkable candor and curiosity. The breeze disarrays the hair of the women behind her; the closing car door cuts a policeman out of the frame. All else is in motion, but this girl is completely still. She was seeing, not thinking of being seen. She did not think to pose. There is a difference between a subject who looks at a camera and one who looks at a cameraman, and this girl was looking at McCartney.

    The exhibition concludes with photographs taken in Miami. By this point, late in their trip, the band looks weary: weary of travel and weary, particularly, of spectators. McCartney’s camera returns reticently to his bandmates, and these photographic encounters seem markedly different. Gone is the breezy youthfulness of the earlier portraits. The celebrities pose with their drinks by the pool, on boats with pretty girls, in the sun with cigarettes. They have begun to see themselves, it seems, through the two-dimensional gaze of the cameras.

    Today, a girl on the streets of DC – or almost anywhere in America – would be more like these fame-worn singers, having learned to pose and to posture and to reduce herself to an image. What are her social-media followers but a constantly watching crowd? This exhibition revisits an era, now closed, in which photographer and photographed could look at each other frankly.